January 14, 2022
Observations on the Ministry’s Reply
Beginning today I shall give you our observations on the ANSWER OF THE MINISTRY OF HEALTH… the “Answer” that blows up the National vaccination programme.
Below I leave you photocopies of the Ministry of Health’s document and, in the text, our first observations on that document:
“OBSERVATIONS
concerning
THE ANSWER OF THE MINISTRY OF HEALTH
to the first 10 questions put under Law 544/2001 by a group of citizens regarding the national vaccination programme imposed de facto by the Government.
Here are the first observations on the answers of the Ministry of Health — answers relevant rather for what they do not say and how they do not say it than for what they say.
But let us take up the questions again and see what the “authorities” and the “specialists” made of them:
What are the updated contraindications of each available vaccine, taking into account their leaflets and the adverse effects recorded worldwide to this date?
Although the question was explicit and referred to “the updated contraindications of each available vaccine”, the “specialists” of the ministry of health referred us to the site https://vaccinare-covid.gov.ro/, where, on accessing https://vaccinare-covid.gov.ro/reactii-adverse-post-vaccinale-indezirabile/, we could not find the requested information set out in detail.
In order to prove the generic, incomplete and truncated character of the data on the above-mentioned site, the Ministry felt obliged to complete them with other contraindications, among which the ones common to each of the 4 available vaccines are those concerning “hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the product’s excipients.”
Only that on the above-mentioned site there is no reference either to these contraindications, nor is it listed separately for each vaccine what the “active substances” or the “product’s excipients” are. Further proof that until now, and even in our own days, there is no precise public information about the adverse effects, nor about the substances that may cause them, although these are at the disposal of the Officialdom.
An extremely pertinent observation on this subject comes from Dan Diaconu, who asks rhetorically: “I shall ask you bluntly: do you know whether you are sensitive to tozinameran? And to the lipid SM-102 (heptadecan-9-yl 8-{(2-hydroxyethyl)[6-oxo-6-(undecyloxy)hexyl]amino}octanoate)? What can you tell me about the sensitivity you have to 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DSPC)? And to 1,2-dimyristoyl-rac-glycero-3-methoxypolyethylene-2000 (PEG2000DMG)? Or to Trometamol? I would ask the clever people at the National Medicines Agency whether they have any idea what these names refer to, and I tell you emphatically that they have not the faintest notion, because they are new substances that embed the messenger RNA. Can any ‘genius’ at the Agency tell me that he has studied ‘single-stranded, 5’-capped messenger RNA (mRNA) produced using a cell-free in vitro transcription from the corresponding DNA templates, encoding the viral spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV-2’? I shall tell you briefly: they have no idea what it is about; they merely copy and paste what the manufacturer gives them, and that is all. Normally, both the National Medicines Agency and the Ministry of Health, institutions which put into circulation the frauds called ‘vaccine’, must say exactly what is the profile of persons with hypersensitivity to those active substances, which are absolutely new! With that formulation — which ought to be forbidden by law — they do nothing but throw the blame on the patient: he died not from the medicine, but because he was hypersensitive to the active substance!”
Hallucinatory too is the contraindication according to which the AstraZeneca vaccine is not indicated for “persons who have presented thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome AFTER vaccination”!!! Really? So if AFTER VACCINATION you have thrombosis syndrome… you go back in time and do not have the vaccine after all! You will see that, although it is obvious that in order to forestall such a situation certain specialised medical analyses ought to be carried out, the Ministry recommends no analysis of any kind.
What matters is that, apart from the references to the manufacturer’s sites, the Ministry mentions express contraindications for persons who “have previously had episodes of capillary leak” or those who “have previously had episodes of capillary extravasation syndrome”…
So, for the first time, the Ministry says expressly that there are some persons who MUST NOT be vaccinated with certain vaccines! — which has not been said until now!!!
Worth noting are the recurring warnings in the document, according to which: “Vaccination must be postponed in the case of persons presenting an acute febrile condition or an acute infection”!!!
In spite of the above, the Ministry further informs us that “at the vaccination centre a Form of expression of informed consent is filled in, whereby the patient consents in an informed manner to the medical act”, although even at this date the Ministry of Health has not been able or has not wished to inform the public correctly and completely about the requested information, which the public ought to have had at its disposal for more than a year.
Probably, however, the most important piece of information is the one according to which “VACCINATION AGAINST COVID-19 IN ROMANIA IS VOLUNTARY”! — a fact that must be an axiom, to be understood and accepted by everyone.”
See the post on FacebookThe Facebook archive keeps no permanent addresses for posts. The link above is rebuilt from the identifier of the attached photograph, and some posts are no longer public — Facebook has deleted, restricted or moved them — so it may answer “This page isn’t available”. If that happens, search for the post by its text on the author’s page.
Comments
Have your say. Comments appear once approved.