January 23, 2021
My Information Campaign (II)
As you will have noticed, in the past few days I have been trying to start a real campaign of information about the indications and contraindications of the Comirnaty vaccine, a campaign based exclusively on the information in the leaflet of the manufacturer Pfizer.
Why? Because it is a matter of life and death! Because almost nobody is doing it. Because the government, through its obsessive campaign in the media paid for with tens of millions of euros, not only fails to present the information made available by the manufacturer himself, but even distorts it, lying to and misinforming the population manifestly, knowingly, deliberately — criminally.
I see from the comments of my friends on fb that this real campaign of information about the indications and contraindications of the Comirnaty vaccine is beginning to have effects. People are reading the Pfizer leaflet (which you will find at the end of this post too) and are beginning to ask themselves questions — questions to which, however, they receive no answer whatever from the “authorities”.
You are my witnesses: at no moment have I urged anyone to be vaccinated, or not to be vaccinated. I have only said that I shall take the decision to be vaccinated after the clinical trials of the Comirnaty vaccine are concluded, that is, after December 2023. And I have urged everyone to inform themselves directly from the source about the anti-covid vaccine, and to ignore the “dogmatising” pro-vaccination campaign.
The effects were not slow in coming: in spite of an obvious sabotage by fb of the visibility of my messages, the mere repeated presentation of the official leaflet of the Comirnaty vaccine is beginning to have effects among the nearly 30 thousand persons I have on my list, who are asking themselves legitimate and natural questions in the process of taking a decision about vaccination, about their health and their lives and those of their kin.
Here are only a few examples:
Karin Nan:
“The leaflet SAYS very clearly: the interaction of the vaccine with other medicines is NOT known! Now, it is known that — especially — elderly persons have many conditions, many of them chronic, for which they take prescribed medication. And then comes the LOGICAL question: why are they so set on vaccinating the elderly and the ‘vulnerable’, when the relevant studies DO NOT EXIST? For this category the vaccine OUGHT to be forbidden.”
Iulia Sacher:
“I do not understand why the devil they keep lying about the immunity of (3, 4, 5, 6 months) offered by this ‘food supplement’ — for a vaccine it is not (it does not break the chain of transmission)!
The manufacturer says clearly in the leaflet that this is not known, that they do not have enough data… And it also says that this filth is in phase 3 of testing! Only the sheep do not see that they are guinea pigs, free of charge! They fell for the feint of the scoundrels who promise freedom… Swindled! This pandemic will end when they feel like it! Or when the sheep wake up!”
Gabriel Gabonne:
“5.3 Preclinical safety data
‘No genotoxicity or carcinogenicity studies have been performed’
Carcinomas, as far as I know, have to do with cancer”
Corina Gîdei:
“In Gibraltar, with a population of about 35,000 inhabitants, there were 9 deaths ‘from Covid’ over the whole period, since last year.
After they began the vaccination they reached 59 deaths in only a few days! In the old people’s homes they are dying by the score. On one day 9 died!!!! on the same day! … They were old, indeed, but they were old last year as well, and the fact that they began to die a few days after the vaccination started is hard to ‘read’ as a ‘coincidence’…
All the more so as the ‘authorities’ did NOT say clearly whether those who died had been vaccinated or not, but gave a vague answer of the sort ‘those with covid had not been vaccinated’… in fact raising still more questions…”
Iulian Razvan Andrei:
“So every person vaccinated has to sign some several pages … of information, or ought to have signed them before the vaccination … to give their consent, correct?”
Catalin Niculita:
“I did not quite understand what it says under the efficacy table… where it says ‘NOTE’… ‘cases with a pcr test and at least one symptom’…. that is, the asymptomatic were not included??”
Ana Petric:
“Purity, the sore point of the vaccines… I have not managed to ‘make out’ their cookery!! I have too many question marks! But I put them to myself in the bathroom, in front of the mirror… I wish us to keep our wits!!! Health to everyone! I did microbiology and vaccinology for 35 years! So my torments are justified, I would say… but who is to listen to a voice from the bathroom… old-fashioned…”
Marcus Demetrius
“Ana Petric I would nevertheless ask you whether this messenger rna fragment can also cause another gene to respond. Say, a gene that would dictate another anomaly? Say, a dysfunction in the organism. If you have understood what I mean.”
Lavi Robu
“In this whole ‘comet’ what irritates me to the point of fury is the exhortation to trust what various more or less specialised individuals say, while at the same time accusing and ridiculing those who have the curiosity to inform themselves independently from as many sources as possible. My blood boils when I hear how they drag through the mud anyone who allows himself the ‘impudence’ of asking questions, of showing scepticism in a situation that may directly affect my health, whether it concerns the disease, the treatment or immunisation. It concerns me directly, and as a being endowed with reason on this planet it is an obligation and a right that nobody can deny me — that of finding out and knowing as much information and detail as possible before taking a decision.”
I shall conclude by repeating what I said the other day in a post entitled “The Comirnaty Flood?”:
And what if the “authorities”, all the “authorities” in the world, are mistaken about the vaccine?
What if the Comirnaty vaccine, in clinical trials until December 2023 — according to the manufacturer Pfizer — is not effective? Or what if it is actually harmful?
These questions are inevitable… and they are vital!
In fact, however small the possibility that the Comirnaty vaccine should be harmful, the risk assumed by the “authorities” is far too great, for we are witnessing a recklessness bordering on suicide… at the level of the species.
For while the possibility of the vaccine’s ineffectiveness would amount to a gigantic planetary “swindle”, a fraud of epic dimensions, the harmfulness of the vaccine — a hypothesis which subsists, however insignificant — would have as its effect a pestilence, a plague that could bring about, if not indeed the extinction of the species, at least a reduction of the population worthy of a flood of biblical dimensions.
Until we see what the future holds for us, I urge you once again to inform yourselves directly from the source about the indications, the contraindications and the adverse effects of the anti-covid vaccine.
You have the right, and indeed the duty, to be informed!
You do it for yourselves and for those close to you.
Inform yourselves:
https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/comirnaty-epar-product-information_ro.pdf
See the post on FacebookThe Facebook archive keeps no permanent addresses for posts. The link above is rebuilt from the identifier of the attached photograph, and some posts are no longer public — Facebook has deleted, restricted or moved them — so it may answer “This page isn’t available”. If that happens, search for the post by its text on the author’s page.
Comments
Have your say. Comments appear once approved.